| Casio Exilim EX-Z70 7.2MP Digital Camera with 3x Anti Shake Optical Zoom (Silver) | 
 enlarge | List Price: $249.95
Buy New: $206.00
You Save: $43.95 (18%)
Buy New/Used/Refurbished from $89.99
Avg. Customer Rating:   (based on 13 reviews)
Sales Rank: 3370
Category: Photography
Publisher: CASIO
Studio: CASIO
Brand: Casio
Label: CASIO
Media: Electronics
System Memory: 8.3
Monitor Size: 250
Optical Zoom: 3
Digital Zoom: 4
Display Size: 2.5
Maximum Focal Length: 18.9
Minimum Focal Length: 6.3
Maximum Resolution: 7.2
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.5
Dimensions (in): 5 x 3 x 0.5
MPN: EX-Z70
Model: EX-Z70
UPC: 079767622275
EAN: 0079767622275
ASIN: B000GJF0XM
Release Date: August 15, 2006
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
|
| Features:
| • | 7.2-megapixel CCD captures enough detail for photo-quality 15 x 20-inch prints | | • | 3x optical zoom with Anti Shake technology; 2.5-inch LCD display | | • | Features Easy Mode, a user-friendly camera menu for beginners | | • | Best Shot function for getting optimal photo results simply | | • | Powered by NP-20 lithium-ion battery (battery and charger included); stores images on SD memory cards (includes 8.3MB internal memory) |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 8 more reviews...
 good value for money August 9, 2008
The camera is in excellent working order and has a good array of features. Excellent value for the money. I received the camera very promptly from the seller. A good buying experience all around. A good way to get a good camera for an excellent price.
cheap, effective, good quality August 5, 2008
uses an sd card
effective
cheap
good quality
comes with cords so you can connect to tv
easy hook up to computer, no software needed
includes optional software and usb cord
easy to use
 Extremely satisfied July 12, 2008
I bought it as a gift for someone in my country.And they are very pleased.I guess its easy to oerate and gives you good quality pictures.
 Highly Disappointing March 25, 2007
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I'm hoping the retailer will take the camera back. Pro's: It's small. Cons: The battery has a very, very short life. After 10-12 pictures, I can't count on it being ready for the next round of photos. Shutter lag is too long. I know that's the number one gripe of all digital camera owners, but this one seems to be worse than any one that I've had. Next Picture cycle time can also be really terrible. If you're looking to capture the moment, chances are you'll be capturing the moment AFTER the moment. Don't get it.
 Stylish and very compact but with limited functionality March 14, 2007
5 out of 6 found this review helpful
This compact 7 megapixel camera will easily fit in a pocket and is very convenient for social occasions. Unfortunately most of these happen indoors and in low light where the camera produces significant noise. This is probably related to the small sensor size. Pictures are good in bright light. I was shocked to discover that there is no aperture priority, shutter priority or manual mode. Instead there are numerous `best shot' modes, abbreviated BS (!). These are designated landscape, children, backlight, eBay, etc. It is hard to know exactly how each mode makes exposure settings so anyone interested in manually controlling depth of field will not like this camera. In short, you can only point, shoot and hope for the best.
Pros
*Compact and stylish.
*Big, bright LCD.
*Low cost.
*Has image stabilization, although a camera this small and light is hard to hold steady so there is probably no net benefit over a larger camera without stabilization.
Cons
*High noise at higher ISO in low light.
*No shutter priority, aperture priority or manual mode.
*Slow to write to SD card. Shutter will not release when taking a rapid sequence of shots - a problem when photographing children.
*Relatively near subjects (children that come towards you, not just flowers or insects) can only be focused in macro mode. This requires going into the menus which is often too slow and inconvenient resulting in missed opportunities. A button on the body would have been much better.
|
|
|
